Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out incremental processing

2016-08-25 Thread Ryan Moats
Guru Shetty wrote on 08/25/2016 03:11:42 PM: > From: Guru Shetty > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: ovs dev > Date: 08/25/2016 03:11 PM > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out > incremental processing > > On 25 August 2016 at 13:04, Guru

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out incremental processing

2016-08-25 Thread Guru Shetty
On 25 August 2016 at 13:04, Guru Shetty wrote: > > > On 24 August 2016 at 18:30, Ryan Moats wrote: > >> As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted >> in an improvement worth the complexity it has added. >> This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental >> processing,

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out incremental processing

2016-08-25 Thread Guru Shetty
On 24 August 2016 at 18:30, Ryan Moats wrote: > As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted > in an improvement worth the complexity it has added. > This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental > processing, along with the persisting of OF flows, > logical ports, mult

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out incremental processing

2016-08-25 Thread Ryan Moats
Russell Bryant wrote on 08/25/2016 12:45:44 PM: > From: Russell Bryant > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: ovs dev > Date: 08/25/2016 12:46 PM > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out > incremental processing > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:30 PM,

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out incremental processing

2016-08-25 Thread Russell Bryant
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Ryan Moats wrote: > As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted > in an improvement worth the complexity it has added. > This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental > processing, along with the persisting of OF flows, > logical ports,

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out incremental processing

2016-08-25 Thread Flavio Fernandes
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 9:30 PM, Ryan Moats wrote: > > As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted > in an improvement worth the complexity it has added. > This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental > processing, along with the persisting of OF flows, > logical ports