On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:45:12AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:56:44PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:41:57AM -0700, Jesse Gro
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:56:44PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:41:57AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:56:44PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:41:57AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:37:47PM -0700, Jesse Gr
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:41:57AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:37:47PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Simon Horman wrot
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:41:57AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:37:47PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:57:20PM -0700, Jesse Gr
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:37:47PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:57:20PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:06 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
>>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:37:47PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:57:20PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:06 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
> >> wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:57:29PM +0900
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:57:20PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:06 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
>> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:57:29PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> >>> hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> > + * Due to the sam
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:57:20PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:06 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:57:29PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >>> hi,
> >>>
> >>> > + * Due to the sample action there may be multiple possible eth types.
> >>> > +
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:06 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:57:29PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
> + * Due to the sample action there may be multiple possible eth types.
> + * In order to correctly validate actions all possible types are tr
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:06 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:57:29PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> > + * Due to the sample action there may be multiple possible eth types.
>>> > + * In order to correctly validate actions all possible types are tracked
>>>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:57:29PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> > + * Due to the sample action there may be multiple possible eth types.
>> > + * In order to correctly validate actions all possible types are tracked
>> > + * and verified. This is done using struct eth_types.
>>
>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:57:29PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> hi,
>
> > + * Due to the sample action there may be multiple possible eth types.
> > + * In order to correctly validate actions all possible types are tracked
> > + * and verified. This is done using struct eth_types.
>
> is ther
hi,
> + * Due to the sample action there may be multiple possible eth types.
> + * In order to correctly validate actions all possible types are tracked
> + * and verified. This is done using struct eth_types.
is there any real-world use cases of these actions inside a sample?
otherwise, how abou
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 12:46:20PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Jesse, Hi Pravin, Hi All,
>
> This patchset makes use of a whitelist to only allow mpls_push actions to
> be applied to packets with an ethertype where the tag order is well defined
> and implemented. This avoids the problem of whe
15 matches
Mail list logo