>
>
> 2016-08-08 7:18 GMT-07:00 Loftus, Ciara :
> >
> > The patch mostly looks good to me, thanks.
> > I'm not 100% sure about the interface. Can we make the flag interface
> > specific?
>
> I'm not 100% sure about making the flag interface specific :) Do you think
> there's a use case for both
2016-08-08 7:18 GMT-07:00 Loftus, Ciara :
> >
> > The patch mostly looks good to me, thanks.
> > I'm not 100% sure about the interface. Can we make the flag interface
> > specific?
>
> I'm not 100% sure about making the flag interface specific :) Do you think
> there's a use case for both client
>
> The patch mostly looks good to me, thanks.
> I'm not 100% sure about the interface. Can we make the flag interface
> specific?
I'm not 100% sure about making the flag interface specific :) Do you think
there's a use case for both client and server mode ports to be used in
conjunction with
The patch mostly looks good to me, thanks.
I'm not 100% sure about the interface. Can we make the flag interface
specific?
If I'm not mistaken we currently limit vhost-sock-dir to be under OVS
rundir. With client mode this is not necessary anymore.
I hope that client will be made the default m
