roie...@gmail.com]
>>Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 2:19 AM
>>To: Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash
>>Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
>>Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] netdev-dpdk: Set pmd thread priority
>>
>>Thanks for the patch.
>Hello Daniele,
>Thanks for looking in
gt;Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> >Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] netdev-dpdk: Set pmd thread priority
> >
> >Thanks for the patch.
> Hello Daniele,
> Thanks for looking in to this patch.
>
> >Is there any reason why core 0 is treated specially?
> it's very un
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniele Di Proietto [mailto:daniele.di.proie...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 2:19 AM
>To: Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash
>Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
>Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] netdev-dpdk: Set pmd thread priority
>
>Thanks for
Thanks for the patch.
Is there any reason why core 0 is treated specially?
I think we should put pmd_thread_setpriority in lib/ovs-numa.c (adding
a ovs_numa prefix), and do nothing if dummy_numa is false. Or perhaps
integrate it the pthread_setschedparam in
ovs_numa_thread_setaffinity_core().
I
