On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
>> Tunnel caching was added to reduce CPU utilization on TX path
>> by caching packet header, So performance gain is directly proportional
>> to number of skbs transferred. But with help
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> Tunnel caching was added to reduce CPU utilization on TX path
> by caching packet header, So performance gain is directly proportional
> to number of skbs transferred. But with help of offloads skb are getting
> larger. So there are less n
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:19:37AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:14:38AM -0700, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
>> > v1-v2:
>> > - Fixed capwap fragment case.
>> > - simplified tnl_send.
>> > --8<--
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:19:37AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:14:38AM -0700, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> > v1-v2:
> > - Fixed capwap fragment case.
> > - simplified tnl_send.
> > --8<--cut here-->8--
> >
> > Tunnel cach
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:14:38AM -0700, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> v1-v2:
> - Fixed capwap fragment case.
> - simplified tnl_send.
> --8<--cut here-->8--
>
> Tunnel caching was added to reduce CPU utilization on TX path
> by caching packe
