> > 2016-07-19 2:53 GMT-07:00 Loftus, Ciara :
> > >
> > > The idea looks very good to me, thanks for working on it.
> > > Very high level comments:
> > Hi Daniele thanks for looking at this.
> >
> > >
> > > Do we need to be limited to pci devices? Perhaps we can accept the
> same
> > > string as r
> 2016-07-19 2:53 GMT-07:00 Loftus, Ciara :
> >
> > The idea looks very good to me, thanks for working on it.
> > Very high level comments:
> Hi Daniele thanks for looking at this.
>
> >
> > Do we need to be limited to pci devices? Perhaps we can accept the same
> > string as rte_eth_dev_attach()
2016-07-19 2:53 GMT-07:00 Loftus, Ciara :
> >
> > The idea looks very good to me, thanks for working on it.
> > Very high level comments:
> Hi Daniele thanks for looking at this.
>
> >
> > Do we need to be limited to pci devices? Perhaps we can accept the same
> > string as rte_eth_dev_attach().
>
> The idea looks very good to me, thanks for working on it.
> Very high level comments:
Hi Daniele thanks for looking at this.
>
> Do we need to be limited to pci devices? Perhaps we can accept the same
> string as rte_eth_dev_attach().
Can you elaborate? For physical devs the string is alway
The idea looks very good to me, thanks for working on it.
Very high level comments:
Do we need to be limited to pci devices? Perhaps we can accept the same
string as rte_eth_dev_attach().
Would it be possible to integrate this more with the hotplug patch? It
would be nice to avoid introducing
