>
> Given that using vhost PMD doesn't seem viable in the very short term, I
> think we should stick with the vhost lib.
> I sent a patch for ovsrcu to add a new RCU protected array index.
>
> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-August/077097.html
> Thanks,
> Daniele
Thanks Daniele, I subm
Given that using vhost PMD doesn't seem viable in the very short term, I
think we should stick with the vhost lib.
I sent a patch for ovsrcu to add a new RCU protected array index.
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-August/077097.html
Thanks,
Daniele
2016-07-28 6:26 GMT-07:00 Loftus, Ci
2016-07-24 11:06 GMT-07:00 Ben Pfaff :
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 10:17:13AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > Daniele Di Proietto writes:
> >
> > > Thanks for the patch.
> > >
> > > I have another concern with this. If we're still going to rely on RCU
> to
> > > protect the vhost device (and as poi
>
> Thanks for the patch.
> I have another concern with this. If we're still going to rely on RCU to
> protect
> the vhost device (and as pointed out by Ilya, I think we should) we need to
> use RCU-like semantics on the vid array index. I'm not sure a boolean flag is
> going to be enough.
> CCi
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 10:17:13AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Daniele Di Proietto writes:
>
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > I have another concern with this. If we're still going to rely on RCU to
> > protect the vhost device (and as pointed out by Ilya, I think we should) we
> > need to use
Hi Daniele,
Daniele Di Proietto writes:
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> I have another concern with this. If we're still going to rely on RCU to
> protect the vhost device (and as pointed out by Ilya, I think we should) we
> need to use RCU-like semantics on the vid array index. I'm not sure a
> bo
Thanks for the patch.
I have another concern with this. If we're still going to rely on RCU to
protect the vhost device (and as pointed out by Ilya, I think we should) we
need to use RCU-like semantics on the vid array index. I'm not sure a
boolean flag is going to be enough.
CCing Jarno:
We ha
