* Ansis Atteka (aatt...@nicira.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> > insert_openvswitch_mod_if_required () {
> > -# If openvswitch_mod is already loaded then we're done.
> > -test -e /sys/module/openvswitch_mod && return 0
> > +# If @OVSKMOD@ is already
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> This is just an RFC, partly because it ignores datapath/ so you could
> build a module that the runtime can't install. Now that the ovs datapath
> is upstream and named simply openvswitch, tools like ovs-ctl fail to
> function w/ the native d
* Ben Pfaff (b...@nicira.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:31:44AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Ben Pfaff (b...@nicira.com) wrote:
> > > I wonder whether we should just drop the "_mod" from our out-of-tree
> > > module names. Seems simpler and less confusing in the long run.
> > >
> >
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:31:44AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Ben Pfaff (b...@nicira.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:28:50PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > This is just an RFC, partly because it ignores datapath/ so you could
> > > build a module that the runtime can't install. No
* Ben Pfaff (b...@nicira.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:28:50PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > This is just an RFC, partly because it ignores datapath/ so you could
> > build a module that the runtime can't install. Now that the ovs datapath
> > is upstream and named simply openvswitch,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:28:50PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> This is just an RFC, partly because it ignores datapath/ so you could
> build a module that the runtime can't install. Now that the ovs datapath
> is upstream and named simply openvswitch, tools like ovs-ctl fail to
> function w/ the
