On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:24:15AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:00:54AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mar 9, 2013, a
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:00:54AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:54 , ext Simon Horman wrote:
>> >
>> >> It is not obvious to me how
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:00:54AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:54 , ext Simon Horman wrote:
> >
> >> It is not obvious to me how the behaviour relating to get_priority() as
> >> described abov
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:54 , ext Simon Horman wrote:
>
>> It is not obvious to me how the behaviour relating to get_priority() as
>> described above can sensibly be reconciled with a desire to preserve the
>> order of acti
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:54 , ext Simon Horman wrote:
> It is not obvious to me how the behaviour relating to get_priority() as
> described above can sensibly be reconciled with a desire to preserve the
> order of actions. Or even reconciled with a looser constraint that actions
> that need l3+ data
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:54 , ext Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:12:31AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 04:12:22AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> Perhaps Ben has some ideas, but it seems to me that the
>>> way that execute_* and compose_* interact needs to be ch
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:12:31AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 04:12:22AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Perhaps Ben has some ideas, but it seems to me that the
> > way that execute_* and compose_* interact needs to be changed
> > around in order to preserve the order of actio
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 04:12:22AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> Perhaps Ben has some ideas, but it seems to me that the
> way that execute_* and compose_* interact needs to be changed
> around in order to preserve the order of actions.
This seems likely to be necessary.
___
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:12:53AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:15:09PM +0900, Simon Horman
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:15:09PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> >> Allow datapath to recognize and extract MPLS labels int
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:15:09PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> Allow datapath to recognize and extract MPLS labels into flow keys
> >> and execute actions which push, pop, and s
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:15:09PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> Allow datapath to recognize and extract MPLS labels into flow keys
> >> and execute actions which push, pop, and s
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:15:09PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> Allow datapath to recognize and extract MPLS labels into flow keys
>> and execute actions which push, pop, and set labels on packets.
>>
>> Based heavily on work by Leo Alterman and
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:15:09PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Allow datapath to recognize and extract MPLS labels into flow keys
> and execute actions which push, pop, and set labels on packets.
>
> Based heavily on work by Leo Alterman and Ravi K.
>
> Cc: Ravi K
> Cc: Leo Alterman
> Reviewed
14 matches
Mail list logo