>
> Sorry for that, I forgot to include a stub for the other cases. That would
> include ESX, right? I am just following how the route-table works.
You can ignore ESX. But, yeah, we will need something for Windows such
that we atleast don't have compilation and run time issues on Windows.
A stub sh
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:59:18PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:55:52PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > I wonder what happens for Windows here.
> >
> I guess we need an if-notifier-windows.c also.
>
Sorry for that, I forgot to include a stub for the other cases. That
I guess we need an if-notifier-windows.c also.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:55:52PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> I wonder what happens for Windows here.
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:24:20PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > wrote
I wonder what happens for Windows here.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:24:20PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
>> Whenever system interfaces are removed, added or change state, reconfigure
>> bridge. This allows late interfaces to be add
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:24:20PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Whenever system interfaces are removed, added or change state, reconfigure
> bridge. This allows late interfaces to be added to the datapath when they are
> added to the system after ovs-vswitchd is started.
>
> Signe