I have a story there. I had a whole "counted list" implementation
ready to go, and then when I went through the tree to find potential
users I found only two. And then when I looked closer I found that
they didn't really need to count. And that's why there's this patch
series that makes them not
Okay, sounds good. It's not large enough that it makes sense to make the lists
counting or anything.
--Justin
On Aug 15, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> When I occasionally look, I usually see about a dozen or so. Not
> enough to concern me, anyway. Some are probably duplicates (same f
When I occasionally look, I usually see about a dozen or so. Not
enough to concern me, anyway. Some are probably duplicates (same fd).
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:06:06PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> It looks fine, but do we have an idea on the number of waiters that typically
> exist?
>
> --J
It looks fine, but do we have an idea on the number of waiters that typically
exist?
--Justin
On Aug 10, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It's always a little risky to track the length of a list by hand, because
> it is easy to miss a spot where the length can change. So it seems like
> a
