% libc-2.18.so[.] __clock_gettime
Thanks,
Kevin.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jarno Rajahalme
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 6:57 PM
> To: Loftus, Ciara
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [P
On Jan 12, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After running some performance tests on the latest master, it appears that
> this commit has caused netdev DPDK performance to drop significantly (by > 50
> %). Has anybody else seen this?
>
I saw notified of this last week, and di
Hi,
After running some performance tests on the latest master, it appears that this
commit has caused netdev DPDK performance to drop significantly (by > 50 %).
Has anybody else seen this?
Regards,
Ciara
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jar
On Jan 6, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:03:15AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:15:13PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:08:41PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme w
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:03:15AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:15:13PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:08:41PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 29, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Ben P
On Jan 5, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:15:13PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:08:41PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:30:42AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalm
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:15:13PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:08:41PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 29, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:30:42AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> > >> So far the compressed flow data in
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:08:41PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:30:42AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >> So far the compressed flow data in struct miniflow has been in 32-bit
> >> words with a 63-bit map, allow
On Dec 29, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:30:42AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> So far the compressed flow data in struct miniflow has been in 32-bit
>> words with a 63-bit map, allowing for a maximum size of struct flow of
>> 252 bytes. With the forthcoming
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:30:42AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> So far the compressed flow data in struct miniflow has been in 32-bit
> words with a 63-bit map, allowing for a maximum size of struct flow of
> 252 bytes. With the forthcoming Geneve options this is not sufficient
> any more.
>
>
Thanks for the helpful explanation.
Thanks.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Jarno Rajahalme
wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Madhu Challa
> wrote:
>
> Jarno,
>
> I did some simple tests increasing flow_tnl size and trying to match on it
> looks good. Thanks for solving this. I have
On Dec 17, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Madhu Challa wrote:
> Jarno,
>
> I did some simple tests increasing flow_tnl size and trying to match on it
> looks good. Thanks for solving this. I have a question inline around
> miniflow_extract. Other than that the diff looks good to me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On
Jarno,
I did some simple tests increasing flow_tnl size and trying to match on it
looks good. Thanks for solving this. I have a question inline around
miniflow_extract. Other than that the diff looks good to me.
Thanks.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Jarno Rajahalme
wrote:
>
> So far the com
13 matches
Mail list logo
