> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:57:08AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> > Testing experimenter OXM is tricky because I do not know of any in
>> > widespread use. Two ONF proposals use experimenter OXMs: EXT-256 and
>> > EXT-233. EXT-256 is not suitable to implement for testing because its use
>> >
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:57:08AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > Testing experimenter OXM is tricky because I do not know of any in
> > widespread use. Two ONF proposals use experimenter OXMs: EXT-256 and
> > EXT-233. EXT-256 is not suitable to implement for testing because its use
> > of ex
> Testing experimenter OXM is tricky because I do not know of any in
> widespread use. Two ONF proposals use experimenter OXMs: EXT-256 and
> EXT-233. EXT-256 is not suitable to implement for testing because its use
> of experimenter OXM is wrong and will be changed. EXT-233 is not suitable
sor
