Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-12 Thread Thomas Graf
On 02/12/15 at 01:08pm, Andy Zhou wrote: > I agree. we now have the initial infrastructure to add more tests. > > In the meantime, the infrastructure can also use some improvements. > For example, it does not deal with kernel crash > very well. Any suggestions or past experiences in setting up k

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-12 Thread Andy Zhou
I agree. we now have the initial infrastructure to add more tests. In the meantime, the infrastructure can also use some improvements. For example, it does not deal with kernel crash very well. Any suggestions or past experiences in setting up kernel testing framework are welcome. On Wed, Feb

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
Vagrant sounds like a real winner. Thanks for working on the kernel testing infrastructure. I hope that we can start to build up a library of tests. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:04:31PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote: > I have experimented with the user-mode linux about a month back. I was > not able to g

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-11 Thread Andy Zhou
I have experimented with the user-mode linux about a month back. I was not able to get ovs user space to run reliably with the (light weight) host-fs file system. It may run better with a disk-image (I did not try), but then we willl have to deal with building and distributing disk-images, which Va

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 01:04:57PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 02/06/15 at 10:28pm, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > We already do a ton of kernel module builds in travis, do you mean that > > we should do one for every released kernel, or do you mean something > > else? > > I'm primarily thinking of Andy'

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-07 Thread Thomas Graf
On 02/06/15 at 10:28pm, Ben Pfaff wrote: > We already do a ton of kernel module builds in travis, do you mean that > we should do one for every released kernel, or do you mean something > else? I'm primarily thinking of Andy's work to enable runtime CI as well. I think the matrix of stable kernels

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-06 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:24:58AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 02/03/15 at 10:09am, Pravin Shelar wrote: > > When I tried this patch series against mainline 3.19-rc7, I got > > following error on insert. > > > > openvswitch: Unknown symbol rpl_vxlan_xmit_skb (err 0) > > openvswitch: Unknown sym

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-04 Thread Thomas Graf
On 02/03/15 at 10:09am, Pravin Shelar wrote: > When I tried this patch series against mainline 3.19-rc7, I got > following error on insert. > > openvswitch: Unknown symbol rpl_vxlan_xmit_skb (err 0) > openvswitch: Unknown symbol rpl_vxlan_sock_release (err 0) > openvswitch: Unknown symbol rpl_vxla

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 11/13] datapath: Allow building against 3.19.x

2015-02-03 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf > --- > FAQ.md | 1 + > NEWS | 2 +- > acinclude.m4 | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/FAQ.md b/FAQ.md > index 02fe2d3..2de4936 100644 > --- a/FAQ.md > +++ b/