Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] util: Disallow zero-sized xmalloc_cacheline

2014-05-05 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:32:34AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 09:01:01AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> >> xmalloc_cacheline API is relatively new. It's better >> >> not to inherit the kludge from xmalloc. This kind of >> >> kludge rather hurts these days. >>

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] util: Disallow zero-sized xmalloc_cacheline

2014-05-05 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:32:34AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 09:01:01AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >> xmalloc_cacheline API is relatively new. It's better > >> not to inherit the kludge from xmalloc. This kind of > >> kludge rather hurts these days. > >> >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] util: Disallow zero-sized xmalloc_cacheline

2014-05-04 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 09:01:01AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> xmalloc_cacheline API is relatively new. It's better >> not to inherit the kludge from xmalloc. This kind of >> kludge rather hurts these days. >> >> Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi > > I see basically three alternatives fo

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] util: Disallow zero-sized xmalloc_cacheline

2014-05-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 09:01:01AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > xmalloc_cacheline API is relatively new. It's better > not to inherit the kludge from xmalloc. This kind of > kludge rather hurts these days. > > Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi I see basically three alternatives for xmalloc(0