On Oct 31, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:02:23PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:17:56PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
Classifier users should not use negative priorities
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 04:02:23PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:17:56PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >> Classifier users should not use negative priorities.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> >
> >
On Oct 31, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:17:56PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> Classifier users should not use negative priorities.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
>
> The only priority that the classifier can't handle properly is
> INT_MIN. Unfortun
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:17:56PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Classifier users should not use negative priorities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
The only priority that the classifier can't handle properly is
INT_MIN. Unfortunately, that's also the one priority that this patch
doesn't