On Sep 5, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
> wrote:
>> On Sep 4, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
>>> wrote:
On Sep 3, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
>> wrote:
>>> On Sep 3, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
> wrote:
>> On Sep 3, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
index 208f26
On Sep 4, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
> wrote:
>> On Sep 3, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
index 208f26
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
wrote:
> On Sep 3, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>> diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
>>> index 208f260..83382b9 100644
>>> --- a/datapath/actions.c
>>> +++
On Sep 3, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
>> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The tun_key
>> includes and replaces the tun_id in both struct ovs_skb_cb
>> and struc
On Sep 3, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
>
> Sorry again about the long delay in getting back to you on this and
> thanks for being so patient. I definitely intend to be much quicker
> about future patches.
>
No worries on my end! I was just hoping to try and start getting some
Hi Kyle,
Sorry again about the long delay in getting back to you on this and
thanks for being so patient. I definitely intend to be much quicker
about future patches.
I think your approach of doing incremental changes is a good one since
the full set of changes is pretty large. The one thing th
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The tun_key
> includes and replaces the tun_id in both struct ovs_skb_cb
> and struct sw_tun_key.
>
> In ovs_skb_cb tun_key is a pointer as
Jesse:
Are you going to have a chance to review these next week? Can you also
comment on if you want to iterate over all of Simon's original patches, or go
down the path I started with these patches, which was to try and get the
initial tun_key changes in, leaving existing functionality in place,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:00:45AM -0400, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The tun_key
> includes and replaces the tun_id in both struct ovs_skb_cb
> and struct sw_tun_key.
>
> In ovs_skb_cb tun_key is a p
On Aug 28, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
> wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:23:51PM -0400, Kyle Mestery wrote:
This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which c
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:23:51PM -0400, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
>>> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The
On Aug 21, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:23:51PM -0400, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
>> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The tun_key
>> includes and replaces the tun_id in both struct ovs_skb_cb
>>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:05:12PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> 2. Ben Pfaff recently pointed out to me that OVS (almost?) consistently
>prefixes hexadecimal strings with "0x". ...
I try to do it consistently[*]. If you find places where 0x is omitted,
let me know.
[*] Except for MAC addres
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:23:51PM -0400, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The tun_key
> includes and replaces the tun_id in both struct ovs_skb_cb
> and struct sw_tun_key.
>
> In ovs_skb_cb tun_key is a p
16 matches
Mail list logo
