On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:50:24PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> >
> > On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >>> barrier->count is used as a simple c
On Aug 29, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>> barrier->count is used as a simple counter and is not expected the
>>> synchronize the state of any other variable, s
On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> barrier->count is used as a simple counter and is not expected the
>> synchronize the state of any other variable, so we can use atomic_count,
>> which uses relaxed atomics.
>>
>>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> barrier->count is used as a simple counter and is not expected the
> synchronize the state of any other variable, so we can use atomic_count,
> which uses relaxed atomics.
>
> Ditto for the 'next_id' within ovsthread_wrapper().
>
