On 5/16/16, 1:07 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>Hi Bryan, I think that you understand how QoS works in NVP. We're
>currently talking about how to implement QoS in OVN. Can you help us
>understand the issues?
>
>...now back to the conversation already in progress:
>
>On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 05:04:06P
Hi,
Ben, Babu, what you're proposing here makes sense, it's aligned with the
plans we were shaping for min-bandwidth guarantees in the openvswitch-agent
[1] [2]
I wasn't aware of the possibility of setting a queue on the external
interface, and reference that from set_queue (I need to unde
Thank you for your answers Ben.
I tried configuring a htb qdisc on a physical interface which is not
attached to any bridge and found the egress shaping working on a tap
device attached to br-int.
Babu
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 01:37 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Hi Bryan, I think that you understand ho
Hi Bryan, I think that you understand how QoS works in NVP. We're
currently talking about how to implement QoS in OVN. Can you help us
understand the issues?
...now back to the conversation already in progress:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 05:04:06PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote:
> On Friday 06 May 2
On Friday 06 May 2016 10:33 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
But I'm still having trouble understanding the whole design here.
Without this patch, OVN applies ingress policing to packets received
from (typically) a VM. This limits the rate at which the VM can
introduce packets into the network, and thus a
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 08:26:46PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2016 08:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:41:40PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote:
> >>On Friday 22 April 2016 10:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:44:12PM +0530, bscha...@red
On Tuesday 26 April 2016 08:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:41:40PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote:
On Friday 22 April 2016 10:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:44:12PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Babu Shanmugam
Following are done through this s
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:41:40PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote:
> On Friday 22 April 2016 10:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:44:12PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com wrote:
> >>From: Babu Shanmugam
> >>
> >>Following are done through this series
> >>1. Changed the old approach of p
On Friday 22 April 2016 10:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:44:12PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Babu Shanmugam
Following are done through this series
1. Changed the old approach of policing the packets. It is now shaped
with queues. Changed the Logical_Port op
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:44:12PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Babu Shanmugam
>
> Following are done through this series
> 1. Changed the old approach of policing the packets. It is now shaped
>with queues. Changed the Logical_Port options for NB db
> 2. Support of DSCP marking
10 matches
Mail list logo
