Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-ctl: Initialize the databases.

2016-09-19 Thread Guru Shetty
On 19 September 2016 at 11:33, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:18:20AM -0700, Guru Shetty wrote: > > On 19 September 2016 at 11:08, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:26:52PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > > > > Without initializing the databases, commands of

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-ctl: Initialize the databases.

2016-09-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:18:20AM -0700, Guru Shetty wrote: > On 19 September 2016 at 11:08, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:26:52PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > > > Without initializing the databases, commands of the form > > > 'ovn-nbctl --wait=sb ls-add ls0' will simply

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-ctl: Initialize the databases.

2016-09-19 Thread Guru Shetty
On 19 September 2016 at 11:08, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:26:52PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > > Without initializing the databases, commands of the form > > 'ovn-nbctl --wait=sb ls-add ls0' will simply hang. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty > > It's better if the

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-ctl: Initialize the databases.

2016-09-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:26:52PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > Without initializing the databases, commands of the form > 'ovn-nbctl --wait=sb ls-add ls0' will simply hang. > > Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty It's better if the separate initialization step is optional. I think that ovn-n