pushed to the master. Thanks,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> That sounds great, thanks a lot.
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:06:11PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote:
> > Sure, I will test it more and wait for a bit before pushing, just in case
> > Guolin has additional feedback. T
That sounds great, thanks a lot.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:06:11PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote:
> Sure, I will test it more and wait for a bit before pushing, just in case
> Guolin has additional feedback. Thanks for the review and redactor
> suggestion.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Ben P
Sure, I will test it more and wait for a bit before pushing, just in case
Guolin has additional feedback. Thanks for the review and redactor
suggestion.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Do you want to check it in then?
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:53:09PM -0800, Andy Zhou
Do you want to check it in then?
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:53:09PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote:
> Yes, this patch would eliminate code duplications. The logic looks right
> to me.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:45:22PM -0800, Andy Zhou wro
Yes, this patch would eliminate code duplications. The logic looks right
to me.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:45:22PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote:
> > Noting updating slow path subfacet's time stamp can cause their datapath
> > flows deleted periodic
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:45:22PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote:
> Noting updating slow path subfacet's time stamp can cause their datapath
> flows deleted periodically. For example, CFM datapath flow have usespace
> actions that are handled in dpif slow path. They are deleted and
> recreated periodicall
