I'm only interested in a general solution, as described in the cited
email. I'm not going to take this change.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:04:52PM +0800, ychen wrote:
> yes, maybe it is not a perfect resolution, but it did resolved
> this problem: when tapB deleted from ovs bridge, tapA's ingress
yes, maybe it is not a perfect resolution, but it did resolved
this problem: when tapB deleted from ovs bridge, tapA's ingress rule disappeared
and of course, there maybe some problem I haven't consider,
so I want more detailed suggestions, thanks!
At 2015-08-20 13:03:53, "Ben Pfaff" wrote
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:29:07AM +0800, ychen wrote:
> port's ingress qdisc rule will automatically disappeared after
> the following steps:
> 1)use ip tuntap to create port tapA and tapB
> 2)set tapA and tapB to ingress qdisc with linux tc command
> 3)add tapA to ovs bridge
> 4)add tapB to the s
