On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:24:51PM +, James Page wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 05/12/13 17:07, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:16:39PM +, James Page wrote:
> > >> Later version
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:29:05PM +, James Page wrote:
> Later versions of gcc on some architectures push atomic functions
> out into a separate atomic library; add a check to see when this
> is required and add it to LIBS if need be.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Page
Applied, thanks. I change
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:24:51PM +, James Page wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 05/12/13 17:07, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:16:39PM +, James Page wrote:
> >> Later versions of gcc on some architectures push atomic
> >> functions out in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/12/13 17:07, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:16:39PM +, James Page wrote:
>> Later versions of gcc on some architectures push atomic
>> functions out into a separate atomic library; add a check to see
>> when this is required
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:16:39PM +, James Page wrote:
> Later versions of gcc on some architectures push atomic functions
> out into a separate atomic library; add a check to see when this
> is required and add it to LIBS if need be.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Page
May I assume that you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/12/13 16:10, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> Later versions of gcc on some architectures push atomic
>> functions
>>> out into a separate atomic library; add a check to see when
>>> this is required.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: James Page
> Is ATOMIC_LIBS nec
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:43:09AM +, James Page wrote:
> Later versions of gcc on some architectures push atomic functions
> out into a separate atomic library; add a check to see when this
> is required.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Page
Is ATOMIC_LIBS necessary or useful? AC_SEARCH_LIBS adds
