Thanks for your comments.
On 10/18/14, 12:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 09:55:57AM -0400, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
On 10/17/14, 4:54 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:19:33PM -0400, Dave Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
...
...
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 09:55:57AM -0400, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
> On 10/17/14, 4:54 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:19:33PM -0400, Dave Benson wrote:
> >>On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>...
>
> >My first thought is to define a new NXM_NX_VLAN_TPID that m
On 10/17/14, 4:54 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:19:33PM -0400, Dave Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
...
My first thought is to define a new NXM_NX_VLAN_TPID that matches the
TPID, and for backward compatibility to imply a match on 0x8100 if i
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:19:33PM -0400, Dave Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > With this change, I think that an OpenFlow flow table entry that
> > matches on a VLAN will now match both 0x88a8 and 0x8100 tags for that
> > VLAN. I doubt that that is desirable
Ben,
Thanks for your thoughtful comments. Apologies for my late reply...
Dave.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:06:29AM -0400, Dave Benson wrote:
> > Previous behavior forced the use of the 802.1Q Ethertype for all VLAN
> headers.
> > In order to
Ben, thanks for your comments on my comments.
On 10/15/14, 5:08 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:14:16AM -0400, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
I am late in commenting on Ben's comments on Dave's patch but I
thought I would add my two cents.
I need to review your patches, too, obviously
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:14:16AM -0400, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
> I am late in commenting on Ben's comments on Dave's patch but I
> thought I would add my two cents.
I need to review your patches, too, obviously. I'll try to do that
soon.
My guess is that your patches are more mature, because
I am late in commenting on Ben's comments on Dave's patch but I thought
I would add my two cents.
On 10/10/14, 6:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:06:29AM -0400, Dave Benson wrote:
One direction that we will probably have to take at some point is to
allow matching and setting
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:06:29AM -0400, Dave Benson wrote:
> Previous behavior forced the use of the 802.1Q Ethertype for all VLAN headers.
> In order to open the door for future support of VLAN stacking or Provider
> Based
> Bridging, support of the 802.1AD Ethertype is a logical first step.
>
