On 22 February 2016 at 17:32, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 19 February 2016 at 06:53, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> > On 02/18/2016 07:37 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> >> On 17 February 2016 at 18:12, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> >>>
>> On Fe
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 19 February 2016 at 06:53, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On 02/18/2016 07:37 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> >> On 17 February 2016 at 18:12, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >>>
> On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
>
>
On 19 February 2016 at 06:53, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 02/18/2016 07:37 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> On 17 February 2016 at 18:12, Justin Pettit wrote:
>>>
On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
Thank you for the write-up! This approach sounds great to me. Some
>
On 02/18/2016 07:37 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 17 February 2016 at 18:12, Justin Pettit wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for the write-up! This approach sounds great to me. Some
>>> small questions...
>>>
>>> 1) If we're only using 1 bit fo
On 02/17/2016 09:12 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thank you for the write-up! This approach sounds great to me. Some
>> small questions...
>>
>> 1) If we're only using 1 bit for now, is there any reason to use
>> ct_label over ct_mark?
On 17 February 2016 at 18:12, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thank you for the write-up! This approach sounds great to me. Some
>> small questions...
>>
>> 1) If we're only using 1 bit for now, is there any reason to use
>> ct_label over ct_
On 8 February 2016 at 22:53, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>
>> On 02/05/2016 02:22 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> > Joe and I spent some time today discussing our options. This is
>> > pretty tricky to get right and most of the options that come
>> > imme
On 02/17/2016 09:12 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> I'm happy to work on the OVN implementation of this approach assuming no
>> alternative supplants it. It sounds fun. :-)
>
> I haven't had a chance to do any coding lately, so if you want to look at it,
> that'd be great!
OK. I'm working on it.
> On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
>
> Thank you for the write-up! This approach sounds great to me. Some
> small questions...
>
> 1) If we're only using 1 bit for now, is there any reason to use
> ct_label over ct_mark? The docs in ovs-ofctl(8) seem to suggest they're
>
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
> On 02/05/2016 02:22 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
> > Joe and I spent some time today discussing our options. This is
> > pretty tricky to get right and most of the options that come
> > immediately to mind have subtle corner cases. We're plan
On 02/05/2016 02:22 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Joe and I spent some time today discussing our options. This is
> pretty tricky to get right and most of the options that come
> immediately to mind have subtle corner cases. We're planning to
> whiteboard more options tomorrow, but I wanted to get d
Joe and I spent some time today discussing our options. This is pretty tricky
to get right and most of the options that come immediately to mind have subtle
corner cases. We're planning to whiteboard more options tomorrow, but I wanted
to get down what's my personal favorite and see what peopl
12 matches
Mail list logo
