On 12/05/14 at 04:06pm, Justin Pettit wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > > Yes. I plan to send him an updated patch set to see what he thinks of
> > > the interface that's there for conntrack and connmark.
> >
> > Excellent. Did you consider a conntrack extension for OV
On Dec 5, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2014 6:14 PM, "Justin Pettit" wrote:
> >
> > [Moving to ovs-dev]
> >
> >
> > Great. As I mentioned, I think we're at least a couple of weeks away from
> > that.
> >
>
> OK. Do you think we can target 2.4? I'll likely post RFCs earli
On Dec 5, 2014 6:14 PM, "Justin Pettit" wrote:
>
> [Moving to ovs-dev]
>
> > On Dec 5, 2014, at 4:41 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >
> > I have a nfqueue action prototype ready. Waiting on conntrack to get
merged.
>
> Great. As I mentioned, I think we're at least a couple of weeks away
from that.
>
Thanks for the update!
On 12/05/14 18:14, Justin Pettit wrote:
[Moving to ovs-dev]
On Dec 5, 2014, at 4:41 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
I have a nfqueue action prototype ready. Waiting on conntrack to get merged.
Great. As I mentioned, I think we're at least a couple of weeks away from that.
[Moving to ovs-dev]
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:30 AM, Franck BAUDIN wrote:
>
> Just a quick email to ask when you’ll expect to push the conntracker, and
> then the extensions we talked about: nfqueue/conn_mark. I’m working on my
> planning for December & January, so any forecast will help J
My g
[Moving to ovs-dev]
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 4:41 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> I have a nfqueue action prototype ready. Waiting on conntrack to get merged.
Great. As I mentioned, I think we're at least a couple of weeks away from that.
> We also got some feedback from Pablo on connmark that we need
