On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:51:23AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:12:54AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:43:15PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >> >> it seems that openflow implementations disagree about OFPMBT_ and
> >> >> encoding
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:12:54AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:43:15PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> >> it seems that openflow implementations disagree about OFPMBT_ and
>> >> encoding of ofp_meter_features.band_types. (see below)
>> >> can anyone clarify w
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:12:54AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:43:15PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >> it seems that openflow implementations disagree about OFPMBT_ and
> >> encoding of ofp_meter_features.band_types. (see below)
> >> can anyone clarify which i
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:43:15PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> it seems that openflow implementations disagree about OFPMBT_ and
>> encoding of ofp_meter_features.band_types. (see below)
>> can anyone clarify which is spec-wise correct? i peeked the spec
>> but it was unclear to me. i'm
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:43:15PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> it seems that openflow implementations disagree about OFPMBT_ and
> encoding of ofp_meter_features.band_types. (see below)
> can anyone clarify which is spec-wise correct? i peeked the spec
> but it was unclear to me. i'm afraid
hi,
it seems that openflow implementations disagree about OFPMBT_ and
encoding of ofp_meter_features.band_types. (see below)
can anyone clarify which is spec-wise correct? i peeked the spec
but it was unclear to me. i'm afraid that other feature bitmaps
have similar problems.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
