On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:45:28PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Ethan,
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:25:31AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > > In short, it would make my life much easier if facets could be looked up
> > > execute_flow_miss(). And I am interested to know if you have any plans i
Hi Ethan,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:25:31AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > In short, it would make my life much easier if facets could be looked up
> > execute_flow_miss(). And I am interested to know if you have any plans in
> > that regards.
>
> This actually is in the exact opposite of the d
> In short, it would make my life much easier if facets could be looked up
> execute_flow_miss(). And I am interested to know if you have any plans in
> that regards.
This actually is in the exact opposite of the direction I'm planning
to move. Facets don't scale to tens of thousands of datapath
Hi Ethan,
I am having a bit of difficulty re-implementing portions of my
recirculation patchset in order to work in conjunction with your recent
change, e1ec7dd ("ofproto-dpif: Implement multi-threaded miss handling.")
In short, it would make my life much easier if facets could be looked up
execu
