> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Traynor, Kevin
> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 5:52 PM
> To: John Xiao
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK support technical direction
>
>
> > -
> -Original Message-
> From: John Xiao [mailto:johnxiao.cl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 2:19 AM
> To: Traynor, Kevin
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK support technical direction
>
> Thanks Kevin,
>
> There is
-Original Message-
>> From: John Xiao [mailto:johnxiao.cl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 2:46 PM
>> To: Traynor, Kevin
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK support technical direction
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> The performance number
> -Original Message-
> From: John Xiao [mailto:johnxiao.cl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 2:46 PM
> To: Traynor, Kevin
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK support technical direction
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> The performance number looks great!
> -
gt;> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:10 AM
>> To: dev@openvswitch.org
>> Subject: [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK support technical direction
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we know that Intel stopped its effort on OVDK and OVS DPDK support
>> will all be in OVS upstream,
://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/18/1600-ovs_perf.pptx
Thanks,
Kevin.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of John Xiao
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:10 AM
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK su
Hi,
As we know that Intel stopped its effort on OVDK and OVS DPDK support
will all be in OVS upstream, and I have one question after digging
OVDK and OVS DPDK architecture:
- IMHO, OVS DPDK support can follow the existing "fast/slow path"
model as being done in OVS linux kernel, i.e. just another
