Well, I try, but it's difficult to remember.
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:39:50AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Thanks. Now we just need to keep it up to date as we make changes, so I
> don't have to sift through hundreds of commit messages around the time of a
> release. :)
>
> --Justin
>
>
Thanks. Now we just need to keep it up to date as we make changes, so I don't
have to sift through hundreds of commit messages around the time of a release.
:)
--Justin
On Aug 8, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> OK, I pushed this change as detailed at the end of this email.
>
> On Sun,
OK, I pushed this change as detailed at the end of this email.
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 04:58:51PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> I suspect you may be over-thinking it, since I think most people just don't
> read documentation. :) However, if it saves even one question, it's worth
> it. In any
I suspect you may be over-thinking it, since I think most people just don't
read documentation. :) However, if it saves even one question, it's worth it.
In any case, it is probably a more appropriate title for what it includes.
Thanks,
--Justin
On Aug 4, 2011, at 9:50 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I've noticed that many users seem to miss changes that we clearly state
in ChangeLog. Some of this is probably due to users not reading any
documentation ever, but I wonder whether some of it is because users
expect ChangeLog to be akin to a commit log, because that's what GNU
software puts in Cha
