On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
>> On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>>> Hi, Pravin. I think commit a36de77 (openvswitch: Userspace tunneling.)
>>> introduces a problem when new actions are a
> On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Hi, Pravin. I think commit a36de77 (openvswitch: Userspace tunneling.)
>> introduces a problem when new actions are added in the kernel. This part
>> makes the kernel's idea of
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Hi, Pravin. I think commit a36de77 (openvswitch: Userspace tunneling.)
> introduces a problem when new actions are added in the kernel. This part
> makes the kernel's idea of actions defined after _TUNNEL_POP different from
> userspace:
Hi, Pravin. I think commit a36de77 (openvswitch: Userspace tunneling.)
introduces a problem when new actions are added in the kernel. This part makes
the kernel's idea of actions defined after _TUNNEL_POP different from userspace:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
@@ -636,6 +663,10 @@ enum ovs_action_attr {
