On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 09:34:06AM +0530, Shashwat Srivastava wrote:
> Thanks for the reply just wanted to confirm did you get any reply
> regarding the EXT-502 from ONF extensibility working group.
Yes, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
If you assume "importance only", I would vote no. Trying to squee
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the reply just wanted to confirm did you get any reply
regarding the EXT-502 from ONF extensibility working group.
Also can you please let me know what will happen if the new flow enters
the switch with same importance as the lowest importance in the flow
table. Considering
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 08:37:14AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:55:45PM +0530, Shashwat Srivastava wrote:
> > I was going through openflow specs 1.4 and as mentioned in section
> > 7.3.4.1. page no. 73 "If the flag OFPTMPEF_IMPORTANCE is the only flag
> > set, eviction wil
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:55:45PM +0530, Shashwat Srivastava wrote:
> I was going through openflow specs 1.4 and as mentioned in section
> 7.3.4.1. page no. 73 "If the flag OFPTMPEF_IMPORTANCE is the only flag
> set, eviction will
> be performed strictly in order of importance, that is flow entr
Hi Team,
I was going through openflow specs 1.4 and as mentioned in section
7.3.4.1. page no. 73 "If the flag OFPTMPEF_IMPORTANCE is the only flag
set, eviction will
be performed strictly in order of importance, that is flow entry with
lower importance will always be evicted before flow entry w
