On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 08:50:55AM +, Niels van Adrichem wrote:
> 2) This was mainly a point of discussion that I am curious towards. I
> am concerned that checking all BFD, OAM, CFM, etc., sequentially may
> harm the throughput of the function odp_port_is_alive(). [...]
I doubt that's a probl
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] BFD integration into FastFailover Group Table
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 01:15:53PM +, Niels van Adrichem wrote:
> For some experiments I did around April/May for a paper I wrote I
> changed some sourcecode to ofproto-dpif-xlate.c to ha
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 01:15:53PM +, Niels van Adrichem wrote:
> For some experiments I did around April/May for a paper I wrote I
> changed some sourcecode to ofproto-dpif-xlate.c to have the FastFailover
> Group Table look at the BFD status directly.
> We did this because we found that altho
Dear OVS devs,
For some experiments I did around April/May for a paper I wrote I
changed some sourcecode to ofproto-dpif-xlate.c to have the FastFailover
Group Table look at the BFD status directly.
We did this because we found that although the BFD status flags changed
in time, interface status r
