Thanks Ben!
From: Ben Pfaff [b...@nicira.com]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 7:59 PM
To: Samuel Ghinet
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Agenda for IRC neeting for 8/13 (Nithin Raju)
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 04:27:01PM +, Samuel Ghinet wrote
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 04:27:01PM +, Samuel Ghinet wrote:
> [QUOTE]
> OVS 1.9.3 needed a trip to userspace for every new microflow. But OVS
> 1.11 introduced megaflows, so that in many cases that is no longer
> necessary.
> [/QUOTE]
> Yeah, the microflow is the kernel flow I was trying to say
am
From: Ben Pfaff [b...@nicira.com]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 6:37 PM
To: Samuel Ghinet
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Agenda for IRC neeting for 8/13 (Nithin Raju)
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 03:24:47PM +, Samuel Ghinet wrote:
> Wh
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 03:24:47PM +, Samuel Ghinet wrote:
> What I was testing against was ovs 1.9.3 and ovs 1.11
OVS 1.9.3 needed a trip to userspace for every new microflow. But OVS
1.11 introduced megaflows, so that in many cases that is no longer
necessary.
> The fact is that, even for
dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Agenda for IRC neeting for 8/13 (Nithin Raju)
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:55:13AM +, Samuel Ghinet wrote:
> port NORMAL and port FLOOD, unlike physical (i.e. ports corresponding to
> specific VMs or to external) or logical (GRE / VXLAN / etc.) are a
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:55:13AM +, Samuel Ghinet wrote:
> port NORMAL and port FLOOD, unlike physical (i.e. ports corresponding to
> specific VMs or to external) or logical (GRE / VXLAN / etc.) are a userspace
> concept only.
> This means that, when a "ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 actions=normal
If, by any chance, some
of these details I mentioned on how flows are generated are wrong, corrections
are welcomed :)
I hope it clarified.
Sam
From: Ben Pfaff [b...@nicira.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:10 PM
To: Samuel Ghinet
Cc: dev@openvswitch.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:08:59PM +, Samuel Ghinet wrote:
> I wanted to point out something about:
> "At a high level, the fraction of packets that make it to userspace should be
> very small. So it is not worth the optimization"
>
> If we have the port NORMAl (and perhaps, FLOOD) set, then
;
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Agenda for IRC neeting for 8/13
Message-ID: <34ae845b-bf0f-4a2f-a542-092973e58...@vmware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
hi,
I just wanted to send out the meeting minutes for any future reference:
Attendees: Alin Serdean, Samuel Ghinet, A
e following topics:
>
> Thanks,
> Alin.
>
> -Mesaj original-
> De la: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] În numele Nithin Raju
> Trimis: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 6:29 PM
> Către: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subiect: Re: [ovs-dev] Agenda for IRC neeting for 8/1
. Reference counting
Thanks,
Alin.
-Mesaj original-
De la: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] În numele Nithin Raju
Trimis: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 6:29 PM
Către: dev@openvswitch.org
Subiect: Re: [ovs-dev] Agenda for IRC neeting for 8/13
Sam/Alin,
I saw a bunch of reviews go out this
Sam/Alin,
I saw a bunch of reviews go out this morning. This is great!
Ben was mentioning that as much as possible, we should keep review comments on
ovs-dev ML. We can certainly discuss stuff about reviews that are better
discussed in an interactive medium, but otherwise, I plan to give out com
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:34:43PM +, Nithin Raju wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Ben Pfaff
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:19:41PM +, Nithin Raju wrote:
> >> 5. Samuel's reviews:
> >> * I'll let Sam and Alin fill this in.
> >
> > I hope that code reviews will be main
On Aug 11, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Ben Pfaff
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:19:41PM +, Nithin Raju wrote:
>> 5. Samuel's reviews:
>> * I'll let Sam and Alin fill this in.
>
> I hope that code reviews will be mainly on the mailing list. That's
> much easier to track. By my count, patches
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:19:41PM +, Nithin Raju wrote:
> 5. Samuel's reviews:
>* I'll let Sam and Alin fill this in.
I hope that code reviews will be mainly on the mailing list. That's
much easier to track. By my count, patches 7 through 13, plus patch
15, of Samuel's 15-patch series h
hi folks,
Here are the items to discuss. Pls. feel free to fill in more items.
1. Netlink implementation discussion - design discussions, status.
2. Discussion about the persistent ports patch that Cloudbase is tasked with.
3. Discussion about P0 issues.
4. Discussion of other issues.
5. Samuel's
16 matches
Mail list logo
