> There's something funny going on with rule_dpif_lookup() calls here.
> handle_flow_miss() calls rule_dpif_lookup(). It only uses it in the
> handle_flow_miss_without_facet() case, and only to pass it to
> handle_flow_miss_without_facet(). In the
> handle_flow_miss_with_facet() case, it still ca
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:15:18PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Upon close inspection, it appears that it's not possible for
> actions to differ between subfacets belonging to a given facet.
> Given this fact, it makes sense to move datapath actions from
> subfacets to their parent facets. It's b
Upon close inspection, it appears that it's not possible for
actions to differ between subfacets belonging to a given facet.
Given this fact, it makes sense to move datapath actions from
subfacets to their parent facets. It's both conceptually more
straightforward, and necessary for future threadi
