Thanks for the change. PAD_SIZE() is indeed much easier to understand.
Acked-by: Andy Zhou
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> PAD_SIZE(x,y) is a little shorter and may have a more obvious meaning
> than ROUND_UP(x,y) - x.
>
> I intend to add more users in an upcoming comment.
PAD_SIZE(x,y) is a little shorter and may have a more obvious meaning
than ROUND_UP(x,y) - x.
I intend to add more users in an upcoming comment.
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
lib/netlink.c |6 +++---
lib/nx-match.c| 10 +-
lib/ofp-actions.c |6 +++---
lib/ofp-actions.h
