On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:00:21AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 10 July 2013 19:03, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > The worker process implementation isn't thread-safe and, once OVS
> > itself is threaded, it doesn't make much sense to have a worker
> > process anyway.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
>
> A
On 10 July 2013 19:03, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The worker process implementation isn't thread-safe and, once OVS
> itself is threaded, it doesn't make much sense to have a worker
> process anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
Acked-by: Ed Maste
X-CudaMail-Whitelist-To: dev@openvswitch.org
__
The worker process implementation isn't thread-safe and, once OVS
itself is threaded, it doesn't make much sense to have a worker
process anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
lib/daemon.c |2 +
lib/vlog.c | 64 +-
2 files changed, 3