Yep, you didn't give me an acked on the last round so I resent it.
Thanks for the reviews.
Ethan
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:24:56PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> There's no particular reason for the function controlling the number
>> of thre
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:24:56PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> There's no particular reason for the function controlling the number
> of threads to be bound up with dpif_recv_set(). This patch breaks
> them up, but as a side effect means threads will run doing nothing
> when datapath upcall rece
There's no particular reason for the function controlling the number
of threads to be bound up with dpif_recv_set(). This patch breaks
them up, but as a side effect means threads will run doing nothing
when datapath upcall receiving is disabled. By doing this, the udpif
thread creation API become
