On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:39:43PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> I've folded this incremental in.
>
> ---
> FAQ | 12 +++-
> NEWS |1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
> index 6d14fc8..b9f655b 100644
> --- a/FAQ
> +++ b/FAQ
> @@ -172,1
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 07:50:16PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> This commit moves responsibility for implementing patch ports from
> the datapath to ofproto-dpif. There are two main reasons to do
> this.
>
> The first is a matter of design: ofproto-dpif both has more
> information than the data
I've folded this incremental in.
---
FAQ | 12 +++-
NEWS |1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index 6d14fc8..b9f655b 100644
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -172,17 +172,11 @@ A: The kernel module in upstream Linux 3.3 and later does
not include
This commit moves responsibility for implementing patch ports from
the datapath to ofproto-dpif. There are two main reasons to do
this.
The first is a matter of design: ofproto-dpif both has more
information than the datapath, and is better suited to handle the
complexity required to implement p
