2015-02-23 22:04 GMT+03:00 Pravin Shelar :
> I am working on STT support for OVS repo. I hope it will get into 2.4.
Thanks!
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabber: v...@selfip.ru
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswi
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> 2015-02-05 16:56 GMT+03:00 Vasiliy Tolstov :
>> As STT have performance benefits to me (i'm use tunnels to transfer traffic
>> from vps also i have mutipath tcp enabled hosts to decrease cost in switches
>> that not have stacking support),
2015-02-05 14:16 GMT+03:00 Thomas Graf :
> STT obviously does some abuse but so do other encaps like VXLAN which
> abuse the outer UDP sport to benefit from RSS. It is however very hard
> to argue with the feedback given.
>
As STT have performance benefits to me (i'm use tunnels to transfer traff
On 02/03/15 at 11:27am, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:19 AM, John W. Linville
> wrote:
> > Thanks for doing that research for me! :-) You don't see any way to
> > work with Dave M. around his objections?
> >
> > Violating an "upstream first" policy seems like you are making an "
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
>
> 2015-02-04 10:04 GMT+03:00 Vasiliy Tolstov :
>>
>> Does it possible to add to readme test results posted in mailing list
>> about vxlan and stt and do this tests also (on the same hardware) for gre,
>> listp, geneve?
>
>
> Or openvswitch
2015-02-03 22:27 GMT+03:00 Pravin Shelar :
> I do not have any plans of pushing STT to upstream kernel. I do not
> think increased STT usage will help us getting STT upstream in future.
> STT is useful tunneling protocol regardless of whether it is upstream
> or not and that is motivation of mergi
Thanks Jesse. Sorry I misunderstood that.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> I think he just meant the pieces to configure the kernel implementation.
>
> Realistically, nobody on this list is going to be able to give you a
> legal opinion. You should talk to a lawyer to determi
I think he just meant the pieces to configure the kernel implementation.
Realistically, nobody on this list is going to be able to give you a
legal opinion. You should talk to a lawyer to determine your rights as
far as patents go.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:11 PM, John Xiao wrote:
> Thanks Jesse!
Thanks Jesse!
That's true that there is no such patch yet.
Pravin just mentioned "I will send out OVS userspace patch on ovs-dev
mailing list." in
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=142257416618642&w=2
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Userspace code is generally licensed und
Userspace code is generally licensed under Apache 2 but I don't think
anyone has proposed such patches to date.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:07 PM, John Xiao wrote:
> Thanks Ben!
>
> For user space tunneling patches, I guess they will be under Apache
> License 2 which also means the patent licenses w
Thanks Ben!
For user space tunneling patches, I guess they will be under Apache
License 2 which also means the patent licenses will be granted by the
patches distributor/patent holder (i.e. Nicira).
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:12:41PM +0800, Joh
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:19 AM, John W. Linville
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:34:07PM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John W. Linville
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:55:25AM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> >> STT patches were posted on netdev mail
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:19 PM, John W. Linville
wrote:
> Thanks for doing that research for me! :-) You don't see any way to
> work with Dave M. around his objections?
>
It seems to be a philosophical objection, which is likely intractable.
> Violating an "upstream first" policy seems like y
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:34:07PM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John W. Linville
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:55:25AM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> >> STT patches were posted on netdev mailing list, But it was rejected.
> >> As policy datapath patches m
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:12:41PM +0800, John Xiao wrote:
> One question on STT IP, is it free to use STT in commercial products?
> I believe Nicira has patents on this.
Assuming that Nicira does, the patches are being offered by the patent
holder under GPLv2, see http://en.swpat.org/wiki/GPLv2_a
Thanks Pravin for sharing the patch.
One question on STT IP, is it free to use STT in commercial products?
I believe Nicira has patents on this.
Thanks,
John
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John W. Linville
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 20
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John W. Linville
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:55:25AM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> STT patches were posted on netdev mailing list, But it was rejected.
>> As policy datapath patches must be accepted first in upstream kernel
>> before ported to OVS repo. Bu
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:55:25AM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> STT patches were posted on netdev mailing list, But it was rejected.
> As policy datapath patches must be accepted first in upstream kernel
> before ported to OVS repo. But considering STT is well known protocol,
> it is used in produ
18 matches
Mail list logo
