FYI All I've dropped this patch.
Ethan
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 12:51:11PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> > Is there any point to testing OVS in a configuration that we won't
>> > distribute?
>>
>> This is a subject in which there could legitimat
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 12:51:11PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > Is there any point to testing OVS in a configuration that we won't
> > distribute?
>
> This is a subject in which there could legitimately be many points of
> view, but I'll take a stab at explaining how I think about it.
>
> To a
> Is there any point to testing OVS in a configuration that we won't
> distribute?
This is a subject in which there could legitimately be many points of
view, but I'll take a stab at explaining how I think about it.
To answer your question: In general no, but with DPDK yes.
If you look at how st
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:20:57PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> These options don't make sense when building portable code, but when
> using the dev script, OVS is built on the same system it's run on.
> They make a small difference in the OVS DPDK testing, hence their
> addition.
Is there any po
These options don't make sense when building portable code, but when
using the dev script, OVS is built on the same system it's run on.
They make a small difference in the OVS DPDK testing, hence their
addition.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
utilities/ovs-dev.py | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3
