On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:10:10PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:10:14PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > > This is nastier than it looks at first. ?Automake is what does the
> > > include processing here (take a look at the generated Makefile in your
> > > build directory: it
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:10:14PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > This is nastier than it looks at first. ?Automake is what does the
> > include processing here (take a look at the generated Makefile in your
> > build directory: it won't have any include directive from this).
> > Automake will err
> This is nastier than it looks at first. Automake is what does the
> include processing here (take a look at the generated Makefile in your
> build directory: it won't have any include directive from this).
> Automake will error out if an include file is missing. That means that
> we need to inc
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 06:42:00PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Should sodepends.pl be copyright 2008, 2011 as well as 2011?
It's derived from soexpand.pl which has a 2008 copyright, so my
(imperfect) understanding of the rules is that the earlier copyright
year should be retained.
> I think the
Should sodepends.pl be copyright 2008 as well as 2011?
I think the indentation is messed up with the OUTER: loop in
sodepends, not sure what the correct style is though so it might be
correct. Quick google search was inconclusive.
Did you intentionally add manpages.mk to the commit? I would thi
This ensures that manpages actually get rebuilt if any of the lib/*.man
fragments that they depend upon are modified.
---
Makefile.am| 16 +++-
build-aux/sodepends.pl | 69 +++
manpages.mk| 255
o
