On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:15:00PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 13:10, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:10:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> >> It has only one caller, and doesn't improve the code's readability.
> >
> > Looks OK to me. ?Might be better with
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 13:10, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:10:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> It has only one caller, and doesn't improve the code's readability.
>
> Looks OK to me. Might be better with a variable instead of with lots
> of line wrapping.
One of the next pat
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:10:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> It has only one caller, and doesn't improve the code's readability.
Looks OK to me. Might be better with a variable instead of with lots
of line wrapping.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswi
It has only one caller, and doesn't improve the code's readability.
---
vswitchd/bridge.c | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vswitchd/bridge.c b/vswitchd/bridge.c
index 186f250..d6a437f 100644
--- a/vswitchd/bridge.c
+++ b/vswitchd/bridge.c
@@
