Seems fine to me. I don't quite understand what exactly we are
worried will break with this approach.
Ethan
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I think that this will work OK, and it should avoid complaints from static
> checkers about using a freed pointer.
>
> Coverity #11069.
I think that this will work OK, and it should avoid complaints from static
checkers about using a freed pointer.
Coverity #11069.
---
lib/leak-checker.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/leak-checker.c b/lib/leak-checker.c
index 8b78182..42b3818 100644
