Same comment as the previous patch, otherwise looks good, thanks.
Ethan
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 14:10, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I'd always assumed that the EWMA code in timeval was enough rate-limiting,
> but I actually encountered a pathological case some time ago that forced
> this coverage informat
I'd always assumed that the EWMA code in timeval was enough rate-limiting,
but I actually encountered a pathological case some time ago that forced
this coverage information to print once a second or so, which seems too
often.
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
lib/coverage.c |5 -
1 files cha
