On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 03:34:32PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > We want to avoid quickly reusing OpenFlow port numbers. Previously,
> > that was indirectly implemented through dpif-linux, which makes an
> > effort to avoid quickly reusing kernel
On Oct 22, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> "git am" says:
>
>Applying: Separate OpenFlow port numbers from datapath ones.
>/home/blp/ovs/.git/rebase-apply/patch:230: trailing whitespace.
>
>warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
>Press any key to continue…
Whoops.
> In t
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:51:53PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> In a future commit, we will make multiple bridges share a single backing
> datapath. Our simple mapping from datapath to OpenFlow port numbers
> won't work, since we'll want the same OpenFlow port numbers on different
> bridges. For
In a future commit, we will make multiple bridges share a single backing
datapath. Our simple mapping from datapath to OpenFlow port numbers
won't work, since we'll want the same OpenFlow port numbers on different
bridges. For example, the OFPP_LOCAL port must be the same on all
bridges, but will
