On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I guess that this should go to branch-1.2 and branch-1.3 also.
I'm pulling it into branch-1.2 right now. The plan is for this whole series to
go into branch-1.3, so it should be covered.
--Justin
___
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:31:41PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> When the OFPPC_NO_FLOOD flag is toggled on the port, the "floodable"
> member of the bundle was not updated. This would cause OFPP_NORMAL to
> not include the proper ports when flooding. With this commit,
> OFPPC_NO_FLOOD changes wi
When the OFPPC_NO_FLOOD flag is toggled on the port, the "floodable"
member of the bundle was not updated. This would cause OFPP_NORMAL to
not include the proper ports when flooding. With this commit,
OFPPC_NO_FLOOD changes will cause the floodable members to be
recalculated.
Found by inspection