On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:46 -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > Perhaps it'd make sense to use net_ratelimit()
>> > instead of printk_once for OVS_NLERR
>>
>> I guess I could see it going either
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:46 -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Perhaps it'd make sense to use net_ratelimit()
> > instead of printk_once for OVS_NLERR
>
> I guess I could see it going either way but I'm not sure I see a
> strong argument for changi
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> Perhaps it'd make sense to use net_ratelimit()
> instead of printk_once for OVS_NLERR
I guess I could see it going either way but I'm not sure I see a
strong argument for changing.
___
dev mailing li
Perhaps it'd make sense to use net_ratelimit()
instead of printk_once for OVS_NLERR
---
net/openvswitch/datapath.h | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.h b/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
index 6be9fbb..0f5e77c 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch
