> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 11:57 AM
> To: Gray, Mark D; Aaron Conole; dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Flavio Leitner
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 2/2] dpdk: Update INSTALL.
On 04/12/15 16:15, Gray, Mark D wrote:
5. Start vswitchd:
>
>- DPDK configuration arguments can be passed to vswitchd via `--dpdk`
>- argument. This needs to be first argument passed to vswitchd process.
>- dpdk arg -c is ignored by ovs-dpdk, but it is a required parameter
>- for dpdk
>
> Why delay the inevitable? :)
>
Absolutely, I agree with the approach. I was just pointing out that issue.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
"Gray, Mark D" writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Aaron
>> Conole
>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:24 AM
>> To: dev@openvswitch.org
>> Cc: Flavio Leitner
>> Subject: [ovs-de
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Aaron
> Conole
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:24 AM
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Flavio Leitner
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [RFC 2/2] dpdk: Update INSTALL.DPDK.md to reflect new
>
A previous change modified the way DPDK configuration would be accepted
by the system. This updates the documentation to align with the new
method of configuring DPDK.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole
---
INSTALL.DPDK.md | 52 ++--
1 file changed, 38 in
