> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 3:37 PM
> To: Traynor, Kevin
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org; Flavio Leitner
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC 1/2] dpdk: Convert initialization from cmdline to
> db
>
&g
Zoltan Kiss writes:
> On 03/12/15 04:23, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Existing DPDK integration is provided by use of command line options which
>> must be split out and passed to librte in a special manner. However, this
>> forces any configuration to be passed by way of a special DPDK flag, and
>> int
On 03/12/15 04:23, Aaron Conole wrote:
Existing DPDK integration is provided by use of command line options which
must be split out and passed to librte in a special manner. However, this
forces any configuration to be passed by way of a special DPDK flag, and
interferes with ovs+dpdk packaging
"Traynor, Kevin" writes:
>> -Original Message-
<>
>> +static int
>> +get_dpdk_args(const struct ovsrec_open_vswitch *ovs_cfg, char ***argv)
>> +{
>> +struct dpdk_options_map {
>> +const char *ovs_configuration;
>> +const char *dpdk_option;
>> +bool default_enabl
Panu Matilainen writes:
> On 12/03/2015 06:23 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Existing DPDK integration is provided by use of command line options which
>> must be split out and passed to librte in a special manner. However, this
>> forces any configuration to be passed by way of a special DPDK flag, a
Mauricio Vásquez writes:
> Dear Aaron,
>
> The general idea looks good to me.
>
> Just some comments inline
>
> On 3 December 2015 at 05:23, Aaron Conole wrote:
>
<< snipped >>
>> +if(lookup) {
>> +char **newargv = grow_argv(argv, ret, 2);
>> +
>> +if (!newargv)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Conole
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:24 AM
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Flavio Leitner
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [RFC 1/2] dpdk: Convert initialization from cmdline to db
On 12/03/2015 06:23 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
Existing DPDK integration is provided by use of command line options which
must be split out and passed to librte in a special manner. However, this
forces any configuration to be passed by way of a special DPDK flag, and
interferes with ovs+dpdk packag
Dear Aaron,
The general idea looks good to me.
Just some comments inline
On 3 December 2015 at 05:23, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Existing DPDK integration is provided by use of command line options which
> must be split out and passed to librte in a special manner. However, this
> forces any confi
Existing DPDK integration is provided by use of command line options which
must be split out and passed to librte in a special manner. However, this
forces any configuration to be passed by way of a special DPDK flag, and
interferes with ovs+dpdk packaging solutions.
This commit delays dpdk initia
10 matches
Mail list logo
